← Search

Dana Frazier

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
258 matches · 131W–127L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dana Frazier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history258 matches
W
Wilda Eade / Kristin Anderson
2026-09-08 · TOC.Hollett · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelly Jude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-21 · MCP.Ho · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Rumiko Ho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-20 · MCP.Fukuzawa · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shelly Jude
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-08-12 · TOC.Hagopian-Edwards · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-09 · TOC.Hagopian-Edwards · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Judith Hagopian-Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · MCP.Ho · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jennifer McGovern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-06 · MCP.Fukuzawa · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aki Komi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
Ilona Peszlen / Beth Johnson
2026-08-04 · TOC.Hollett · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Regina Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christine Qubeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · TOC.Hagopian-Edwards · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Asa Burnham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · TOC.Hagopian-Edwards · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
69.4%
34W–15L · 60% of games
3.0
45.1%
41W–50L · 48.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 41.2% of games
5.0
50%
3W–3L · 55.6% of games
5.5
72%
18W–7L · 56.8% of games
6.5
47.4%
18W–20L · 46.8% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 59.1% of games
6.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 22.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
82 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
79 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
69 matches
#1 Singles
5%
13 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches
#3 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer