← Search

Karen Ellis

— year-end
222 matches · 134W–88L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Karen Ellis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history222 matches
W
2026-08-10 · Shore Shots 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eileen Goss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Shore Shots 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Mudditt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-30 · Penn Ball Wizards · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Goss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-26 · Team Ellis · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tymara Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Penn Ball Wizards · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Ticse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-22 · Shore Shots 65+ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Vanderbeek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-14 · Team Ellis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tymara Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-10 · Dangerous Divas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Mudditt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-2
W
2026-06-09 · Penn Ball Wizards · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eileen Goss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Dangerous Divas · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Mudditt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-01 · Shore Shots 65+ · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Linda Mudditt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-31 · Team Ellis · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Heins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
60.7%
51W–33L · 52.6% of games
4.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 47.8% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
72.2%
52W–20L · 57.5% of games
9.0
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.6% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.5% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
90 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
41 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert