← Search

Makenzie Woodward

— year-end
20 matches · 17W–3L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Makenzie Woodward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Carmody, MacKenzie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Andria Nanney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
Jackson Stanford / Saia Stetelman
2026-07-19 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hunter Holcomb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-28 · Hattiesburg 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noah Rowell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-13 · Ramsey, Nikki · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sumner Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-06 · Ramsey, Nikki · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Barry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-02 · Ramsey, Nikki · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sumner Douglas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-14 · Davidson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Regan Rhian Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-09-04 · Davidson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Rodgers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-09-30 · Brown/Coleman Northwood 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurie Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2024-09-17 · Brown/Coleman Northwood 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taylor White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-09-08 · Brown/Coleman Northwood 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laurie Cobb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-09-04 · Brown/Coleman Northwood 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Taylor White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 57.8% of games
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 68.9% of games
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
5 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer