← Search

Renee Dozier

— year-end
24 matches · 16W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Renee Dozier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Canebrake 18+ 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · Canebrake 18+ 3.0-4.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Roseberry-3.5-4.5-Canebrake · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-23 · Dozier Canebrake 4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-10-13 · Racquet Club · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Wendi Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-09-25 · Canebrake 8.5 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Tracy Roseberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-11 · Dozier/Tri-Level 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-07-23 · Dozier/Tri-Level 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Maya Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-07-09 · Dozier/Tri-Level 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-06 · Stewart · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-04-27 · Stewart · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2025-02-16 · Stewart · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 43.1% of games
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.3% of games
6.5
100%
4W–0L · 70.4% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
10 matches
#1 Singles
17%
4 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches
#2 Singles
8%
2 matches
#3 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams