← Search

Akash Agrawal

Waldorf, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 86W–27L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Akash Agrawal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-08-09 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with PAULA SMITH mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · Well Strung · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Avraham Amram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · Team 7 Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Demetrius Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-16 · Well Strung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · with Vicky White Hall championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Amilcar Gomez / Kathryn Davis
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · with Vicky White Hall championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-01 · #1 Doubles · with Vicky White Hall championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-25 · Team 7 Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Burke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-19 · Well Strung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-18 · Well Strung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan K Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · Well Strung · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-13 · Racq Pack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carrie Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 69.4% of games
4.0
66.7%
18W–9L · 59.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.2% of games
3.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 87.1% of games
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.8% of games
7.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 68.5% of games
8.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 64.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King