← Search

Tina Rohm

Annapolis, MD
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
231 matches · 130W–101L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tina Rohm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history231 matches
L
2026-09-10 · Davidson - Sets in the City 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Donaldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-5
L
2026-09-03 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenae Fadden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-30 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Avraham Amram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Demetrius Crawford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · Racq Pack · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Avraham Amram mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-09 · Baldwin · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelsey Forbes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-04 · Racq Pack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Richard Sexton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Slice Girls · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-23 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Orso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-22 · Racq Pack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Demetrius Crawford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · Koch · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Timothy Murphy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.1% of games
3.5
62%
49W–30L · 56.3% of games
4.0
40%
8W–12L · 44.7% of games
6.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 54.2% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 47% of games
8.0
11.1%
1W–8L · 42.3% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
68.3%
28W–13L · 55.7% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
62 matches
#1 Singles
17%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
38 matches
#2 Singles
6%
14 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe