← Search

Tomo Carson

Lancaster, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 34W–110L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tomo Carson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
2026-08-18 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaye Mede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-11 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Cavanaugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-12 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Loke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Furness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
Deborah Marshall
2026-06-25 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-16 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Rasmuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Martha Furness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Jessica May / Mary Garman-Miller
2026-06-08 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Nancy ONeill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · Hempfield TCTT - Carson · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Barosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · Hempfield - Woods-Kelly · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaye Mede
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-29 · Hempfield - Tomodachi · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Vera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-11 · Hempfield - Tomodachi · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Joseph Vera mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
20%
2W–8L · 38% of games
3.0
23.3%
7W–23L · 38.8% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 35.7% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 25.3% of games
6.0
20.5%
9W–35L · 35.5% of games
7.0
26.7%
4W–11L · 39.8% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
27.3%
9W–24L · 38.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
38 matches
#1 Female Singles
7%
10 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer