← Search

Cyndy Phillips

Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
155 matches · 99W–56L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Cyndy Phillips to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history155 matches
L
2026-05-06 · Crowder/LF/18s 4.0W · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-02 · OKWC/Wood/55&over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Scroggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-23 · Crowder/LF/18s 4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-15 · Crowder/LF/18s 4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emilee Irby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-28 · OKWC/Wood/55&over8.0W · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Diane Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · OKWC/Wood/55&over8.0W · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Scroggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-11-10 · Rhodes/LFDAY4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Crowder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-22 · Rhodes/LFDAY4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Crowder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2025-10-20 · Huntley/PH/4.0W · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2025-10-15 · Rhodes/LFDAY4.0W · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Oquin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-18 · TULSA/ Wood 8.0 55s/SH · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Scroggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-05-14 · Orange 1: Watling/SH 3.5W · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
43.8%
7W–9L · 47.7% of games
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 54.2% of games
3.5
75.5%
40W–13L · 58.9% of games
4.0
32.4%
11W–23L · 43% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65% of games
8.0
77.8%
7W–2L · 62% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
81%
17W–4L · 66.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
21 matches
#2 Singles
11%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe