← Search

Bobbi Jo Gibson

Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
218 matches · 123W–95L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Bobbi Jo Gibson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history218 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Knox/LF/40&over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynette Thurman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Nunley/IS/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Marcell Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Nunley/IS/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Marcell Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-08-04 · Nunley/IS/tri 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jaclyn Herthneck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-23 · Nunley/IS/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jaclyn Herthneck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · Whitten/LF 18s 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antonia Parchuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-09 · Kolman/LF 18s 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · 2. Duke 55s 7.0/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-04 · Kolman/LF 18s 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-02 · 2. Duke 55s 7.0/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shannon Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-02 · Whitten 55s 8.0 /LF · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Betty Klein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-29 · Whitten/LF 18s 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antonia Parchuri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
43.3%
13W–17L · 50.4% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
66.3%
63W–32L · 56.6% of games
4.0
29.7%
11W–26L · 42% of games
7.0
83.8%
31W–6L · 61.9% of games
8.0
16.7%
2W–10L · 38.4% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
62 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams