← Search

Danielle Rossi

Wilmington, DE
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 49W–50L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Danielle Rossi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
L
2026-07-21 · Triple Threat · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · Triple Threat · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deb Yardley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-06 · Baseline Babes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laurie Housey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-2
L
2026-06-09 · Baseline Babes · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Iwasyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Jennifer Roberts / Nancy Wood
2026-06-02 · Baseline Babes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raisa Rivero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Smart Aces · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
Jennifer Jones / Marcia Hiehle
2026-05-27 · Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raisa Rivero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Smart Aces · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Holladay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hamer-Maansson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-16 · Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raisa Rivero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-17 · Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raisa Rivero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2025-12-22 · Smart Aces · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Raisa Rivero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games
3.0
55.2%
16W–13L · 54.5% of games
3.5
38%
19W–31L · 44.6% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
43 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova