← Search

Carrie Poulsen

Lakewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 178W–51L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Carrie Poulsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
W
2026-09-03 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marlene Swartz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Johnstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Eng championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Marlene Swartz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
Lauren Behm / Jennifer Bell
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Shaun Howe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · NJ BLACK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shaun Howe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-09 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kevin Furlong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rick Bonczynski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Rebecca Strobel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-30 · NJ BLACK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Vladika
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · NJ BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Erik E Lindholm mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · NJ BLACK · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kerry Mobley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
88.9%
32W–4L · 66.3% of games
2.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.4% of games
3.0
64.9%
24W–13L · 58.2% of games
3.5
79.3%
23W–6L · 60.4% of games
6.0mixed
78.6%
22W–6L · 62.2% of games
6.5mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 64% of games
7.0mixed
95.8%
23W–1L · 76.7% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 58.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
76 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
43 matches
#1 Female Doubles
11%
24 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
5%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova