← Search

Karen Sampson

— year-end
84 matches · 35W–49L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Karen Sampson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history84 matches
L
2025-11-20 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-06 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christine Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-10-12 · Deb Ellis/OH 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-10-11 · Deb Ellis/OH 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-11 · Deb Ellis/OH 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Steffen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-4
L
2025-10-10 · Deb Ellis/OH 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Westwater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-10-02 · Olympic 1 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda McBride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-25 · Olympic 1 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-6
W
2025-06-25 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanie Dalton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Becky Savage / Elizabeth Miller
2025-05-21 · Olympic 2 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Kuzma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-05-02 · Wickertree 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-03-21 · Wickertree 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Kulesa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams28 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
45.5%
15W–18L · 47.9% of games
7.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 44.6% of games
7.5
40.7%
11W–16L · 44.3% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 48% of the time
#3 Doubles
48%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams