← Search

Erica Rozanczyk

New Albany, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
95 matches · 43W–52L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Erica Rozanczyk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
W
2026-05-08 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Matsanoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Isil Erel Koksal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-29 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Lisa Bailey / Jenny Glonek
2026-03-27 · Scarborough 3 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-1
L
2026-03-23 · Scarborough 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bridget Sirak
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Susan Busch / Susan Parsons
2026-03-22 · Scarborough 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erica Portnoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
Marie Hamilton / Kristy Campbell
2026-03-20 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Marilee Hanna / Carly Seiferas
2026-03-16 · Scarborough 3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Traci Golis
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-15 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Levine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-08 · Scarborough 2 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-06 · Scarborough 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenna THOMPSON
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
73.1%
19W–7L · 63.7% of games
3.0
35.8%
24W–43L · 43.6% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
17 matches
#2 Singles
10%
9 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert