← Search

Mary Nalder

— year-end
73 matches · 51W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Mary Nalder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Watson, Lee Anne · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aubrey Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Watson, Lee Anne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lee Anne Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · Owens, Leslie · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennie Eichelberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-12 · Watson, Lee Anne · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Shelley White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-11 · Owens, Leslie · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Craft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-22 · Galey, Amanda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa McGee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-01 · Watson, Lee Anne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonya Covey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-26 · Galey, Amanda · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa McGee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-05 · Galey, Amanda · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amber Mullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-04 · Watson, Lee Anne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Tripoli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-26 · Galey, Amanda · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-25 · Watson, Lee Anne · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lee Anne Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
63.6%
21W–12L · 61.3% of games
3.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.5% of games
5.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 64.8% of games
6.5
75%
9W–3L · 59.1% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
15 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King