Katie Hambrick
170 matches · 129W–41L · seasons 2020–2026
Captains: add Katie Hambrick to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history170 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Teams56 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 73.8% of games
3.5
73.7%
14W–5L · 63.4% of games
4.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.3% of games
5.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 67.3% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 62.4% of games
4.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 72.4% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 58.3% of games
7.5mixed
84.2%
16W–3L · 61.7% of games
8.0mixed
61.5%
16W–10L · 55.8% of games
8.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.7% of games
9.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 46% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
28 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.