← Search

Hoa Lesselroth

Tulsa, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 89W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Hoa Lesselroth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-06-28 · Guernsey/LF 18s 8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tom Schmidt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · Guernsey/LF 18s 8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Guernsey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-05-10 · Guernsey/LF 18s 8.0X · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Kossman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-05-03 · Stitt/LF/40s 8.0X · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Santiago Ruiz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-12-09 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-06 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-27 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-21 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-09-29 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with April Bonnet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-09-15 · TULSA: Hale/4.0W/LF · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-24 · Hale/LF · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deborah Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-10-10 · Hale/LF · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Betsy Bryce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.4% of games
3.5
100%
23W–0L · 68.6% of games
4.0
73.5%
25W–9L · 58.7% of games
4.5
53.8%
14W–12L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 61.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
15W–10L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert