← Search

Andres Seijas

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
156 matches · 100W–56L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Andres Seijas to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history156 matches
L
2026-08-16 · APR-E RED · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hanna Feldman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-19 · APR-E RED · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hanna Feldman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · GPTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bret Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · GPTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bret Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · GPTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bret Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-05 · JCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brooke O'Drobinak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · GPTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John McManemin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-22 · JCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Janice Jensen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · GPTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bret Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-10 · GPTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Voogt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · GPTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dylan Pearson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-27 · GPTC BLUE · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
0.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.1% of games
3.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 57.9% of games
4.0
65.5%
57W–30L · 53.7% of games
8.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 52.6% of games
8.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
55 matches
#1 Singles
30%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
28 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
9 matches
#1 Male Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer