← Search

Devin Anderson

Draper, UT
3.0C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 14W–26L · seasons 2020–2025

Captains: add Devin Anderson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2025-08-01 · South Jordan-Rose · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Katie Rose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-03-29 · Sports Mall-Rose · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie Rose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-03-22 · Sports Mall-Rose · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie Rose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-03-01 · Sports Mall-Rose · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie Rose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2023-06-28 · South Jordan-Christensen/Larkin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bill Larkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2023-06-21 · South Jordan-Christensen/Larkin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Craig Breinholt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-06-14 · South Jordan-Christensen/Larkin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manoj Gangwar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2023-05-19 · South Jordan-Rose · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie Klement mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
Myles Ozo / Dan Murray
2023-05-17 · South Jordan-Christensen/Larkin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeff Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-05-12 · South Jordan-Rose · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie Klement mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-26 · South Jordan-Christensen/Larkin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pinen Chen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-04-21 · South Jordan-Rose · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Katie Rose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 36.4% of games
5.5mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 47.5% of games
6.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 33.9% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
10 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer