← Search

Torey Wahlstrom

Chapel Hill, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 97W–65L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Torey Wahlstrom to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
Kelly Johnson / Amy Hoots
2026-09-02 · ALeinbach.8.5C-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lori Petty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-17 · ALeinbach.8.5C-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Leah Weinberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-10 · ALeinbach.8.5C-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Godelief Gomperts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · TWahlstrom-CHTC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-12 · TWahlstrom-CHTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-28 · PDovel-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ellen Libby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-08-25 · ALeinbach-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kimber Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2025-08-18 · ALeinbach-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Hallie Shinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
N/A
2025-08-16 · JPerry-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Shannon Lawrence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-08-16 · ALeinbach-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lori Petty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-08-15 · VArne-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Beth Spinarski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2025-08-14 · PDovel-DUR · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Starritt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
71.4%
15W–6L · 60.3% of games
4.0
55.3%
26W–21L · 54.7% of games
4.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
69.7%
23W–10L · 60.4% of games
8.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.6% of games
4.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 36% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
32 matches
#1 Singles
16%
26 matches
#2 Singles
11%
18 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe