← Search

Jessica Sahoo

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 76W–59L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jessica Sahoo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-08-10 · LOCH.Anderson · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Gresko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Capetanos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · LOCH.Anderson · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ana Maria Fernandez Serrat
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-08-02 · LOCH.Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · LOCH.Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathy Rex
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Mulcahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6
W
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Capetanos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-18 · LOCH.Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with DeLana Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-05 · LOCH.Schwartz · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindy Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-01 · LOCH.Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with DeLana Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
12W–4L · 66.8% of games
3.0
60.7%
37W–24L · 54.7% of games
3.5
37.5%
6W–10L · 46.5% of games
5.0
20%
1W–4L · 46.7% of games
5.5
40%
6W–9L · 52% of games
6.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams