← Search

Sarah van Saun

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
158 matches · 76W–82L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah van Saun to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history158 matches
L
2026-09-14 · PW.McGowan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Penabad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-11 · PW.Kupfrian · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lisa Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-03 · PW.Kupfrian · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ruth Dobson-Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Ruth Smith / Anne Marie Miller
2026-09-02 · PW.Kraft · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Brenna Magliulo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-28 · PW.Kupfrian · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Nishi Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-27 · PW.Kupfrian · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ruth Dobson-Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · PW.McGowan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Hollis Mertens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-21 · PW.Kupfrian · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lan Zhu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · PW.Kupfrian · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Emory Lydick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristin Comer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-06 · PW.Kupfrian · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Kupfrian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-28 · PW.Kraft · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Penny Kraft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
56.5%
13W–10L · 52.8% of games
3.0
46%
29W–34L · 46.6% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 62.3% of games
5.5
36.4%
12W–21L · 43.5% of games
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 53.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
40 matches
#1 Singles
8%
13 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe