← Search

Michele Mulcahy

Apex, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
316 matches · 150W–166L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michele Mulcahy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history316 matches
W
2026-08-25 · TOC.Thio · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shirley Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-08-20 · ANP.Keelor · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christine Dukiet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · TOC.Thio · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shirley Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-10 · TOC.Hinckley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lora Guerra
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-10 · MCP.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosanne Facktor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · ANP.Keelor · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Felten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-03 · MCP.Hinckley · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiffani Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-31 · TOC.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with DeLana Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · TOC.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Sahoo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6
L
2026-07-06 · TOC.Hinckley · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tiffani Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-26 · TOC.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with DeLana Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · NMAC.Thio · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Jabusch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
51.2%
22W–21L · 55.3% of games
3.0
51.6%
66W–62L · 49.8% of games
3.5
35.4%
17W–31L · 43.8% of games
5.0
100%
6W–0L · 83.7% of games
5.5
47.5%
19W–21L · 49.9% of games
6.5
45%
18W–22L · 49% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
108 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
90 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
80 matches
#1 Singles
5%
15 matches
#2 Singles
4%
11 matches
#3 Singles
3%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova