← Search

Jill Bramini

Dayton, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 82W–56L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jill Bramini to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
L
2026-08-09 · KTC-Elsass · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Gill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · QRRC-Fishman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deborah Whitcomb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · QRRC-Fishman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lyuda Fishman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · KTC-Elsass · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patrick Gill mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · QRRC-Fishman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Bennington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-02 · KTC-Elsass · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laurel Crowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · KTC-Elsass · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with TOMOKO WELDE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · KTC-Elsass · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessie Loeffelholz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-11 · QRRC-Fishman · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lyuda Fishman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-03-28 · QRRC-Fishman · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Metzcar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · KTC-Elsass · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Staci Alfes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-03-07 · QRRC-Elsass · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Madoffori mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 70.4% of games
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 72.6% of games
3.5
63.5%
33W–19L · 55% of games
4.0
25%
6W–18L · 41% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
55.9%
19W–15L · 50.1% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King