← Search

Aiko Lapinski

Novi, MI
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 152W–92L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Aiko Lapinski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history244 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · FAC-Machus 40s 4.0 DW F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
N/A
2026-06-15 · FAC- Machus 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-11 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madoka Minamoto
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-10 · FAC-Machus 40s 4.0 DW F · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen McDiarmid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · FAC- Machus 18s 4.0 DW F · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-05 · FAC-Bartholomew 18s 8.0X F · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Howard Weingarden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-04 · FAC-Steiner 40s 4.0 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Tipton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · FAC-Bartholomew 18s 8.0X F · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chiaki Matsuo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
70.6%
72W–30L · 60.6% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 40.7% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 63.7% of games
7.5
76.2%
16W–5L · 62% of games
8.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 56.2% of games
8.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.3% of games
9.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.4% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
18W–9L · 56.9% of games
9.0mixed
27.6%
8W–21L · 41.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 26% of the time
#1 Doubles
26%
63 matches
#1 Singles
24%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
41 matches
#2 Singles
8%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer