← Search

Sanjeev Kamat

— year-end
178 matches · 66W–112L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Sanjeev Kamat to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history178 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Kamat-Jin (F) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Thomas Bostick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · Double Trouble (Brown) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Bade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-16 · Double Trouble (Brown) · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ramona Behshad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Hong Kong Phooey (Shouldis) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Severine Huchet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-19 · Tennis Freaks (Kamat) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Tebbe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Tennis Freaks (Kamat) · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracey Tebbe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-10 · STL/Petruska/40&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Fikes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-06 · STL/Petruska/40&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christopher Fikes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-29 · STL/Petruska/40&Over3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Holman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-28 · Double Trouble (Brown) · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tina Bade mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · STL/Petruska/40&Over3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Holman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · Hong Kong Phooey (Shouldis) · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Severine Huchet mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
Teams45 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.7% of games
3.0
83.3%
15W–3L · 63.4% of games
3.5
24.4%
22W–68L · 41.1% of games
4.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 26% of games
6.0mixed
65%
13W–7L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 43.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
41 matches
#2 Singles
22%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
26 matches
#1 Singles
9%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams