← Search

Dana Best

Saint Charles, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
139 matches · 37W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Best to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-07-10 · Hit Men - Rhoads · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Boone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · Hit Men - Rhoads · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jerry Edsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-5
W
2026-05-09 · STL/Rhoads/Good Vibrations/55&Over7.0M · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Charles Schultz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-03 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bart Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-26 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Hardebeck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-12 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-03-29 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-2, 1-0
L
2026-03-15 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sambit Mohanty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-11 · Schultz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Hendrix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-04 · Schultz · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andre Rog
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-1, 0-1
L
David Fox / George Hendrix
2026-03-01 · Yoder (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sambit Mohanty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
36%
27W–48L · 46% of games
4.0
11.4%
4W–31L · 36.1% of games
7.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 33.3% of games
8.0mixed
8.3%
1W–11L · 32.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 63% of the time
#3 Doubles
63%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert