← Search

Deborah Borge-Shaffer

Ocala, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 18W–38L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Deborah Borge-Shaffer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-12 · FK/ Haynes · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Heidi Yates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · FK Ehler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Perrone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-30 · FK Ehler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Perrone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · FK Ehler · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Berardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Lynn Godwin / Lisa King
2026-05-03 · #3 Doubles · with Hera Peterson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · with Kathy Hatfield championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-13 · Marion/Haynes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Donna Jarvis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · FK BLACKERT · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jack Moring mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-30 · Marion/Haynes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Hatfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-25 · Marion/Haynes · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Hatfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · Marion/Haynes · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Hatfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-01-16 · FK BLACKERT · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jack Moring mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 43.2% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 48.3% of games
7.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.5% of games
8.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 43.6% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
15 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe