← Search

Tara Wiebe

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 59W–70L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Tara Wiebe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-08-31 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy McIlroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-17 · DTC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Elmore Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy McIlroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · DTC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Todd Wiebe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-27 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Elmore Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · DTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Todd Wiebe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · CACM GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Elmore Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Elmore Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheida Lahabi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Camille Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Elmore Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-05-27 · CACM GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheida Lahabi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
44%
11W–14L · 47.8% of games
2.5
63.9%
23W–13L · 56.4% of games
3.0
34%
17W–33L · 45% of games
5.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.5% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#1 Female Singles
12%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
9 matches
#1 Singles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert