← Search

Todd Wiebe

Denver, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 43W–27L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Todd Wiebe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-02 · DTC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Wiebe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · DTC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · DTC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tara Wiebe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Greg Allen / Mark Anderson
2026-06-30 · DTC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Pfaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Prometheus Trotsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-16 · DTC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-05-26 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ted Marolt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-05-23 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · DTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · DTC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evan Pfaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-14 · DTC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Prometheus Trotsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 68.6% of games
3.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 51.9% of games
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 65.3% of games
6.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.2% of games
6.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Singles
11%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert