← Search

Jessica Mardis

Tulsa, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
81 matches · 50W–31L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Jessica Mardis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Steinke/PH/40&over3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Burd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · Steinke/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-11-04 · Coffey/PH/3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dana Burd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-29 · McGinty/Dickason/PH/3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-10-08 · McGinty/Dickason/PH/3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-10-07 · Coffey/PH/3.5W · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-30 · Coffey/PH/3.5W · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-09-17 · McGinty/Dickason/PH/3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sheilah Bright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-10 · McGinty/Dickason/PH/3.5W · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-09-09 · Coffey/PH/3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Coffey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-09-02 · Coffey/PH/3.5W · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-11 · McGinty/Dickason/PH · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
61.1%
11W–7L · 52.8% of games
3.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 59.5% of games
3.5
57.5%
23W–17L · 49.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 57% of the time
#1 Singles
57%
46 matches
#2 Singles
14%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams