← Search

Stephanie Kolman

— year-end
141 matches · 77W–64L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Stephanie Kolman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history141 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Burris/LF/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-02 · Mullenix 55s 7.0X/LF · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Hayward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Mullenix 55s 7.0X/LF · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Hayward mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-16 · 1: Kolman 55s 7.0W/LF · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Hale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · Kolman/LF 18s 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · 1: Kolman 55s 7.0W/LF · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Buechler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · 1: Kolman 55s 7.0W/LF · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Crockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-04-16 · Kolman/LF 18s 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bobbi Jo Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-31 · Kolman/LF 18s 3.5W · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-03-28 · 1: Kolman 55s 7.0W/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shari Singleton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-25 · Kolman/LF 18s 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Crockett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · 1: Kolman 55s 7.0W/LF · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 61.4% of games
3.5
59%
59W–41L · 53.3% of games
7.0
45%
9W–11L · 50.6% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
35 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams