← Search

Dana Burd

Collinsville, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 76W–100L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Dana Burd to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Steinke/PH/40&over3.5W · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Mardis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-09-02 · Steinke/PH/40&over3.5W · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
John Lee / Stefanie Lee
2026-08-21 · Nichols/PH 55s 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Vanderveen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · Nichols/PH 55s 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Vanderveen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-10 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Grace Doyle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-04 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Spring Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · Nichols/PH 55s 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Vanderveen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · Nichols/PH 55s 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Vanderveen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · Nichols/PH 55s 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Vanderveen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · Jmaeff/LF/tri 3.5W · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lyndsey Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · Whitten/LF 18s 4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · Whitten/LF 18s 4.0 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
31%
9W–20L · 44.3% of games
3.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
40.2%
33W–49L · 45.6% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 33.9% of games
7.0
55%
11W–9L · 51.9% of games
8.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
85%
17W–3L · 58.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
32 matches
#2 Singles
14%
24 matches
#1 Singles
9%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe