← Search

Danielle Britten

Las Vegas, NV
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 55W–68L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Danielle Britten to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-05-30 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-16 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wael Eid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-05 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-05-02 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-28 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammie Meng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-14 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ashley Richas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Wael Eid mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-11 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-04-01 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Margaret Bruno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-31 · SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chelsi Grady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
47.6%
20W–22L · 48.8% of games
3.0
43.6%
34W–44L · 47.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
5 matches
#2 Female Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert