← Search

Asad Nawaz

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 17W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Asad Nawaz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
L
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Kondler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-17 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawanna Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-09 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-25 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Neubauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · SPANISH OAKS · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawanna Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-18 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · SPANISH OAKS · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Hom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-28 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randy Cox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-24 · RED ROCK CC #3 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jack Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-01 · WHITNEY MESA PARK · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ingrid Fitzgerald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
23.7%
14W–45L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches
#1 Male Doubles
7%
5 matches
#2 Male Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert