← Search

Jeana Swan

Madison, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
116 matches · 50W–66L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Jeana Swan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history116 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vonda Reeves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-1
W
2026-08-19 · Clark, Robin · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sherry Bouldin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
Amanda Carter / Laura McMahon
2026-08-13 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emberly Holmes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Robin Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lanessa Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-05 · Beasley, Kay · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kari Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-22 · Mitchell, ReJohnna · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bertha Brookins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-22 · Mitchell, ReJohnna · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bertha Brookins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-03 · Trigg, Anita · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kay Beasley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-03-26 · Coins, Jimmie · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bertha Brookins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-22 · Mitchell, ReJohnna · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bertha Brookins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-15 · Trigg, Anita · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lanessa Jenkins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 62.6% of games
3.0
45.9%
17W–20L · 46.9% of games
3.5
22.2%
6W–21L · 36% of games
5.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 44.3% of games
6.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 47.4% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 56.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
25 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King