← Search

Francisco Burbano

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
162 matches · 79W–83L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Francisco Burbano to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Da.McNulty40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with David McNulty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · Mi.Ratliff18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Todd Sprouse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-23 · Mi.Ratliff18C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Martin Burbano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-20 · Da.McNulty40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Peter Flack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-09 · Mi.Ratliff18C6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Martin Burbano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Ratliff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-23 · MCP.Ratliff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Montgomery Fletcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-17 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Testa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-16 · MCP.Ratliff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Polhemus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · Mi.Ratliff18S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-09 · Mi.Ratliff18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Testa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-30 · Mi.Ratliff18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
74.3%
26W–9L · 60.9% of games
3.5
26.4%
14W–39L · 42.1% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 31.1% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 50% of games
6.5
53.1%
17W–15L · 49.5% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 39% of games
3.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 43.3% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
36 matches
#2 Singles
8%
13 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#3 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert