← Search

Cary Campbell-Knight

Henrico, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
40 matches · 29W–11L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Cary Campbell-Knight to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-09-11 · CCV DeLacey · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shula Good
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · Reifsnider-CCV · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · CCV Avery · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Galanti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · CCV AVERY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Fishero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-24 · CCV AVERY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Galanti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-24 · CCV DeLacey · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lia Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-19 · Reifsnider-CCV · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lia Mooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · CCV AVERY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Mauck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · Reifsnider-CCV · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Fishero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-12 · Reifsnider-CCV · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-12 · CCV DeLacey · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Fishero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · CCV DeLacey · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abigail Fishero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
78.9%
15W–4L · 60.4% of games
4.0
80%
4W–1L · 66.7% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.8% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.2% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
12 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#4 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe