← Search

Carol Hoefer

MOSELEY, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
291 matches · 145W–146L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carol Hoefer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history291 matches
L
2026-09-09 · ACAC Camden/Hoefer · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-02 · ACAC Camden/Hoefer · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Price
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-5
L
2026-08-25 · ACAC 10sBradts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Weisberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-19 · ACAC Camden/Hoefer · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carole Camden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Jane Riddle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Kirsten Boyd / Karen Gilmore
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Jane Riddle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
Christie Jackson / Megan Farr
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Jane Riddle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-08-12 · ACAC Camden/Hoefer · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-08-10 · ACAC Camden/Hoefer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Weisberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-03 · ACAC 10sBradts · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · ACAC Camden/Hoefer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tatiana Smirnov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · ACAC-Hoefer/LaRue · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brittany Krebs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
48.2%
81W–87L · 49.6% of games
6.5
40.7%
11W–16L · 46.5% of games
7.0
60.5%
26W–17L · 56.2% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 49.7% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 53% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
105 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
103 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
60 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#3 Singles
2%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova