← Search

Lacey Hood

— year-end
44 matches · 18W–26L · seasons 2021–2024

Captains: add Lacey Hood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2024-07-16 · A18 3.5W PW2 Rummel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel van Meter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2024-07-10 · A18 4.0W PW2 Connor · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Analia Dimit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-19 · A18 4.0W PW2 Connor · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Susan Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Stefanie Radachi / Jennifer Smith
2024-06-18 · A18 3.5W PW2 Rummel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel van Meter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2024-06-12 · A18 4.0W PW2 Connor · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Kuznicki
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2024-06-04 · A18 3.5W PW2 Rummel · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Gracie Milano
2024-05-29 · A18 4.0W PW2 Connor · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2024-05-28 · A18 3.5W PW2 Rummel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel van Meter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2024-05-15 · A18 4.0W PW2 Connor · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Lily Gossett / Angela Lewis
2023-07-20 · A18 4.0W PW2 Connor · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2023-07-12 · A18 3.5W PW2 Rummel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-06-14 · A18 3.5W PW2 Rummel · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
Teams16 teams · 2021–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.1% of games
4.0
18.8%
3W–13L · 40.1% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Singles, 36% of the time
#2 Singles
36%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#1 Singles
16%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova