← Search

Dawn Larson

Greenwood Village, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 70W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dawn Larson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
W
2026-07-28 · LTFC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · LTFC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katai Itta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · with Caren Swan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Caren Swan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-07 · LTFC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-09 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laney Abrahamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · PTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-28 · PTC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Caren Swan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-05-26 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Field
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-21 · PTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Caren Swan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · PTC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristin Chapman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
60.8%
45W–29L · 56.5% of games
3.5
50%
10W–10L · 49.3% of games
6.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 65.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
27 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe