← Search

Eve Little Bradford

JOHNSON CITY, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
38 matches · 30W–8L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Eve Little Bradford to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Hinkle/META · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lydia Ferguson-Hoskins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-29 · Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
Seth Whitley / Christina Betancourt
2026-07-20 · Hinkle/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · Betancourt/META · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Timothy Heimbach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-27 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Austin Helton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · Hinkle/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ricky Frye mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · Hinkle/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lance Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
Heidi Kasten
2026-05-19 · Mo/META · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-13 · Thacker/META · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Barb Janiszewski / Laura Mitchel
2026-04-13 · Lovelace/Greeneville · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-12 · Mo/META · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynne Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
92.9%
13W–1L · 70.9% of games
3.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.8% of games
6.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.8% of games
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 71.3% of games
3.5mixed
100%
5W–0L · 76.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams