← Search

Chris Blackstone

Johnson City, TN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 21W–31L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Chris Blackstone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-08-26 · Bunch/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jay Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
Doug Levin / Jean Swindle
2026-07-23 · Bunch/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-20 · Bunch/META · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Damon Dean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Betancourt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-15 · Bunch/META · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-5
W
2026-07-08 · Betancourt/META · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Barb Janiszewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · Bunch/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynne Little mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-04-25 · Bunch/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Bunch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Tim Sturgill / Jeff Moffatt
2026-04-21 · Bunch/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
Seth Whitley / Omkar Bhat
2026-04-15 · Bunch/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Damon Dean
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · Bunch/META · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Bunch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-03-28 · Bunch/META · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Bunch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 49.7% of games
3.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.8% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 30.8% of games
7.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 53% of games
3.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 49.7% of games
3.5mixed
40%
4W–6L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
10 matches
#1 Singles
14%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer