← Search

Peanut Kempe

— year-end
26 matches · 14W–12L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Peanut Kempe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history26 matches
L
2026-08-19 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Wolff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-18 · CCV AVERY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alden McDaniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-12 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Albright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-05 · BACA Lowe Key Ladies · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Wolff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-30 · CCV Wellford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Kamps Taliaferro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-26 · 3.5 MRTC 40+ Champs Buchanan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christin Kettering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · 3.5 MRTC 40+ Champs Buchanan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Hyde
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · CCV Wellford · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Bailey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-6
L
2026-06-27 · 3.5 MRTC 40+ Champs Buchanan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meriwether Arnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-14 · 3.5 MRTC 40+ Champs Buchanan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Xuemin Ginsberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-30 · CCV Wellford · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Kamps Taliaferro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · CCV Wellford · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
90%
9W–1L · 63.7% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 37.8% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 61.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
5 matches
#2 Singles
15%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova