← Search

Ann Kamps Taliaferro

Richmond, VA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 27W–9L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ann Kamps Taliaferro to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history36 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Ridgetop-Scammell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alden McDaniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-29 · Ridgetop - Scammell · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Scammell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-26 · Ridgetop-Scammell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alden McDaniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · CCV AVERY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ericka Zeballos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-23 · Ridgetop - Scammell · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alice McCollum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-13 · CCV Wellford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Caroline Wellford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-10 · Ridgetop-Scammell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Scammell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Ridgetop-Scammell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Scammell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-03 · CCV AVERY · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Berkeley Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-30 · CCV Wellford · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peanut Kempe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · 13 Ridgetop - Scammell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Scammell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · 13 Ridgetop - Scammell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Victoria Galiffa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.1% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 60.2% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.4% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
7 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer