← Search

Nina Brown

Clarkston, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
281 matches · 146W–135L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nina Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history281 matches
L
2026-08-31 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rajendra Shekhawat mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-19 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacob Sa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-10 · WESS-Brown 6.5 COMBO MIX · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jacob Sa mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
April Mckeever / Billy Schaber
2026-08-04 · WESS-Brown 18s 6.0X F · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Dheyaa Abdulhadi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Catherine Topf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Terri Griffin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-25 · #2 Doubles · with Alice Currier championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-17 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Gordon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-16 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Topf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-10 · WESS-Brown 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sean Gordon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · FAC-Slazinski 18s 3.5 DW F1 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Samantha Ruma
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-09 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Bakken
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.8% of games
2.5
52.6%
10W–9L · 50% of games
3.0
68.7%
46W–21L · 59.1% of games
3.5
37%
10W–17L · 41.7% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 47.7% of games
6.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 44.6% of games
6.5
25%
3W–9L · 49.1% of games
5.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 61.2% of games
6.0mixed
51.6%
16W–15L · 51% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
82 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
67 matches
#1 Singles
9%
24 matches
#2 Singles
6%
16 matches
#3 Singles
5%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova