← Search

Annie Bakken

Bloomfield Hills, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
79 matches · 46W–33L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Annie Bakken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history79 matches
W
2026-07-20 · WESS-Bednas 40s 3.0 DW F2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meg Spence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bonnie Treece
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · WESS-Bednas 40s 3.0 DW F2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susana Soler Miquel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-07-09 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-02 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-22 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Matuska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nina Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-08 · WESS-Brown 40s 3.5 NW F3 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacey Slazinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · WESS-Bednas 40s 3.0 DW F2 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meg Spence
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-28 · WESS-Brown 18s 3.0 NW F5 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Yasuko Tagawa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · WESS-Brown 30 WOMEN winter SINGLES · #1 Singles · 6.0
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
82.8%
24W–5L · 60.1% of games
3.5
40%
4W–6L · 42.8% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.8% of games
6.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 53.4% of games
6.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 37.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 30% of the time
#2 Doubles
30%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
11 matches
#2 Singles
11%
9 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova