← Search

Daniel Pena

Overland Park, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
55 matches · 26W–29L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Daniel Pena to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history55 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Nagy, Kyle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Oswaldo Bravo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-13 · Nagy, Kyle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · Nagy, Kyle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · Nagy, Kyle · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Andrew Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Cook, Brad · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · Cook, Brad · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trevor Holsinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-04 · Cook, Brad · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · Cook, Brad · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Harlan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-14 · Cook, Brad · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · Cook, Brad · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-09 · Cook, Brad · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrew Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-11-22 · Holsinger, Trevor · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 55.4% of games
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.4% of games
3.5
26.1%
6W–17L · 42.9% of games
4.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
13 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert