← Search

Scott A Green

— year-end
182 matches · 124W–58L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Scott A Green to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history182 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Erdely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-03 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-30 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with DIANE CASANOVA mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-27 · Kelly/Jacobson · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Yannone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-15 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-12 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordon Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · Erdely/Kovalski Tri-Level · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mike Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-27 · Kelly/Jacobson · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Jacobson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · Erdely 2026 40+ 4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neal Nottrott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · Koch · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tammi Molavi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
96.6%
28W–1L · 69.2% of games
4.0
53.8%
21W–18L · 51.5% of games
7.0
100%
7W–0L · 74.3% of games
7.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.2% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.5% of games
7.0mixed
75.6%
31W–10L · 61.9% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 51.5% of games
8.0mixed
58.3%
14W–10L · 53.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
75 matches
#1 Doubles
40%
73 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer