← Search

Frank Burnett

Millersville, MD
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
187 matches · 72W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Frank Burnett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Farooq · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristopher Wenn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-09-03 · Farooq · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Umer Farooq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-30 · Farooq · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Rothstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-13 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-03 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · Farooq · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Rothstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-30 · Walsh · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-29 · Harper · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Forbes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5
L
2026-07-22 · Harper · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cary Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-15 · Harper · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Forbes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-01 · Harper · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Scott Stickels
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · Walsh · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with David Connell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
76.5%
13W–4L · 62.6% of games
3.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 58.9% of games
3.5
18.6%
8W–35L · 36.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0
55.3%
21W–17L · 53.8% of games
7.0
18.9%
10W–43L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
67 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
48 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe