← Search

Amanda Dana

Omaha, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 32W–13L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Amanda Dana to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-08-31 · Goldapp/Kephart · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Wahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · Goldapp/Kephart · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bridget Mckeegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-09 · Goldapp · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-06-02 · Goldapp · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-19 · Goldapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-22 · Goldapp · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-01-25 · Goldapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-04 · Goldapp · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tara Arnold
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-17 · NE/Kephart/Tri3.0-4.0W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with LiQin Kephart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-09-15 · NE/Kephart/Tri3.0-4.0W · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-09-03 · Hazelrigg · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Claire Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2025-08-27 · Hazelrigg · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Claire Hogan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.5% of games
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
85.7%
18W–3L · 59.9% of games
4.0
50%
4W–4L · 45.8% of games
7.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
13%
6 matches
#2 Singles
11%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer